Incentives · Head to head

Compare provinces

Pick two provinces on the map. Same production, stacked the same way, so the numbers are directly comparable — modelled on a $12M USD limited series.

Interactive · net effective rate on a $12M limited series

Pick two provinces to compare them head to head.

QC 27.7% Quebec — 27.7% NL 27.3% Newfoundland and Labrador — 27.3% BC 25.4% British Columbia — 25.4% NU Nunavut — no service incentive NT Northwest Territories — no service incentive NB New Brunswick — no service incentive NS 28.5% Nova Scotia — 28.5% SK 27.7% Saskatchewan — 27.7% AB 25.4% Alberta — 25.4% PE Prince Edward Island — no service incentive YT Yukon Territory — no service incentive MB 31.5% Manitoba — 31.5% ON 25.1% Ontario — 25.1%
No service programme 25%31%
Ranked · net effective rate on total budget
MB
31.5% C$5.2M
NS
28.5% C$4.7M
QC
27.7% C$4.6M
SK
27.7% C$4.6M
NL
27.3% C$4.5M
BC
25.4% C$4.2M
AB
25.4% C$4.2M
ON
25.1% C$4.1M

Rates verified 2026-07-29 · NL is a placeholder pending primary sourcing · simplified model.

Provincial breakdowns
BC ON QC AB MB NS SK
All 28 head-to-head comparisons
BC vs ON BC vs QC BC vs AB BC vs MB BC vs NS BC vs SK BC vs NL ON vs QC ON vs AB ON vs MB ON vs NS ON vs SK ON vs NL QC vs AB QC vs MB QC vs NS QC vs SK QC vs NL AB vs MB AB vs NS AB vs SK AB vs NL MB vs NS MB vs SK MB vs NL NS vs SK NS vs NL SK vs NL
Next

Weighing Canada against elsewhere?

Compare Canada's stacked credits against Georgia, the UK, Ireland, Hungary, Australia and New Zealand.

Canada vs. the world → Production fit check

Weighing two of these for a real production?

The ranking holds at $12M. Change the format or the labour split and the order changes with it.

One email, a real reply, no list. Want to say more? Use the full form.